Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The Inclusion Imperative. Forging an Inclusive New Urban Agenda

Abstract

Over the next 32 years, cities will shape virtually every aspect of global development, including the manner in which rights to housing, health, and education are won or wasted, implemented or ignored (Marcuse and Van Kempen, 2011; Sassen, 2011). The urban century can transform the productive capacity and outcomes of the estimated 400-600 million urban citizens who live with disabilities. This number is set to increase dramatically by 2050 when 66% of the global population will be living in cities (Acuto, 2013; Alger, 2013). Of the projected increase of 2.5 billion urban dwellers,[1] 15-20% are expected to be persons with disabilities.[2] Well-planned cities have dramatically improved the social and economic outcomes for individuals with a range of disabilities, their families, and the larger communities they participate in.  Well-planned cities take into consideration the widest range of needs and incorporate design standards that assume that a significant portion of the population may have difficulty seeing, hearing, or moving around without assistance.

A growing body of research now shows that the most pressing issue faced by millions of persons with disabilities worldwide is not their disability but rather social exclusion (Abendroth et al., 2015; Ahmmad et al., 2014; Al Qadi et al., 2012; Amedeo and Speicher, 1995; Anguelovski, 2013; Bezmez, 2013). Poor planning, and unregulated urban development can have devastating consequences for persons with disabilities. According to the United Nations CRPD Committee, “Without access to the physical environment, to transportation… and to other facilities and services open or provided to the public, persons with disabilities would not have equal opportunities for participation in their respective societies.”[3] The committee also states that “Accessibility is a precondition for persons with disabilities to live independently and participate fully and equally in society.”[4]

Gender, ethnicity, and poverty, compound existing exclusions for persons with disabilities, limiting their access to opportunities.


[1] The proportion of the world’s urban population is expected to increase to approximately 57% by 2050. African Development Bank, http://www.afdb.org/en/blogs/afdb-championing-inclusive-growth-across-africa/post/urbanization-in-africa-10143/.

[2] Approximately 90% of this increase will be concentrated in African and Asian cities like Shenzhen, Karachi, Lagos, Guangzhou, Dhaka, Jakarta, and many others that have urbanized at a rate of 40-60% between 2000-2010

[3] CRPD/C/GC/2

[4] The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination guarantees everyone the right of access to any place or service intended for use by the general public, such as transport, hotels, restaurants, cafes, theatres and parks (art. 5 (f)). Thus, a precedent has been established in the international human rights legal framework for viewing the right to access as a right per se.

Published:
Pages:1 to 20
Section: Editorial
How to Cite
Pineda, V., Meyer, S. and Cruz, J. (2017) “The Inclusion Imperative. Forging an Inclusive New Urban Agenda”, The Journal of Public Space, 2(4), pp. 1-20. doi: 10.5204/jps.v2i4.138.

Downloads

Total Abstract Views: 399  Total PDF Downloads: 180

Author Biographies

Victor Pineda is a scholar, urban planner, social entrepreneur, speaker and globally recognized human rights advocate. He is also an adjunct professor and consultant on policy, planning and development. Dr. Pineda’s work focuses on urban resilience, inclusion and sustainability. He founded the Pineda Foundation / World Enabled, a global non-profit that promotes the rights of people with disabilities. He was recently appointed by President Obama to serve on the US Access Board. Dr. Pineda holds a PhD in Urban Planning from UCLA.
University of Washington
United States United States
Stephen Meyers studies the interactions between international law and grassroots associations. He research and publications focus on the ways in which the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) has affected the form and behavior of Disabled Persons Organizations (DPOs) in the Global South. Dr. Meyers holds a PhD in Sociology from the UCSD. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the University of Washington with appointments in the Law, Societies & Justice Department and the Jackson School of International Studies and an affiliation with the Disability Studies Program.
World Enabled
United States United States
John Paul Cruz is a research associate for World Enabled and a senior analyst for the Global Initiative for Inclusive ICTs. He was a Fulbright visiting fellow at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. He holds an MA in Comparative and International Disability Policy from American University, Washington, DC.

References

Abendroth, Lisa M., and Bryan Bell (2015). Public Interest Design Practice Guidebook: SEED Methodology, Case Studies, and Critical Issues. Routledge.

Acuto, Michele (2013), Global Cities, Governance and Diplomacy: The Urban Link. Routledge. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mJaCX0qiRy0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Global+Cities,+Governance+and+Diplomacy&ots=Oia0VlHVWt&sig=fZB8cPrLxL34O_mKS7_IZIYr5fA.

Ahmmad, M. Roungu, and M. Nurul Islam (2014). “Impact of Disability on Quality of Life of Urban Disabled People in Bangladesh.” International Journal of U-& E-Service, Science & Technology, 7, no. 4. http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJUNESST/vol7_no4/21.pdf.

Alger, Chadwick F. (2013), The UN System and Cities in Global Governance. Springer. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-00512-6.pdf.

Al Qadi, Naim Salameh, and Ayman Awad Gharib (2012).“The Economic and Social Changes Faced by People with Special Needs Arising from Poverty in the South Region of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.” Canadian Social Science, 8, no. 4: 28–37.

Amedeo, Douglas, and Kate Speicher (1995). “Essential Environmental and Spatial Concerns for the Congenitally Visually Impaired.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 14, no. 2 (January 1): 113–22. doi:10.1177/0739456X9501400204.

Anguelovski, Isabelle (2013). “New Directions in Urban Environmental Justice Rebuilding Community, Addressing Trauma, and Remaking Place.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 33, no. 2 (June 1): 160–75. doi:10.1177/0739456X13478019.

Arnot, Madeleine, and Sharlene Swartz (2012). “Youth Citizenship and the Politics of Belonging: Introducing Contexts, Voices, Imaginaries.” Comparative Education 48, no. 1 (February 1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/03050068.2011.637759.

Artuso, Mario (2014). “UN Habitat, State of the World’s Cities 2012/13 – Prosperity of Cities, London, Earthscan, 2013, 184 Pp., ISBN 13: 978-0-415-83888-7. Tab. Graph. Images.” Urban Research & Practice 7, no. 3 (September 2): 359–60. doi:10.1080/17535069.2014.968363.

Audirac, Ivonne (2008). “Accessing Transit as Universal Design.” Journal of Planning Literature 23, no. 1 (August 1): 4–16. doi:10.1177/0885412208318558.

Barber, Benjamin R. (2013). If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. Yale University Press.

Beard, John R., Charles Petitot, and others (2010). “Ageing and Urbanization: Can Cities Be Designed to Foster Active Ageing.” Public Health Reviews, 32, no. 2: 427–50.

Bell, Daniel A., and Avner De-Shalit (2013). The Spirit of Cities: Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age. Princeton University Press. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Bf0wAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=The+spirit+of+cities+why+the+indentity+of+a+city+matter+in+a+global+age&ots=r_e0diFXvf&sig=eHMJKNUiO9t0W6Jab9HWxlmh1vU.

Bezmez, Dikmen (2013). “Urban Citizenship, the Right to the City and Politics of Disability in Istanbul.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, no. 1: 93–114. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01190.x.

Chen, Honglin (2013). “A Study of Older People with Disability: Evidence from Two Cosmopolitan Cities.” Ageing International 38, no. 4: 328–42.

Clarke, Philippa, Jennifer A. Ailshire, Michael Bader, Jeffrey D. Morenoff, and James S. House (2008). “Mobility Disability and the Urban Built Environment.” American Journal of Epidemiology 168, no. 5: 506–13.

Dumbaugh, Eric (2008). “Designing Communities to Enhance the Safety and Mobility of Older Adults A Universal Approach.” Journal of Planning Literature 23, no. 1 (August 1): 17–36. doi:10.1177/0885412208318559.

Durst, Douglas, Mary Helen Sinkins Bluechardt, Georgina Morin, and Melissa Rezansoff (2001). Urban Aboriginal Persons with Disabilities: Triple Jeopardy!. Social Policy Research Unit, University of Regina.

Durst, Douglas, Shelly Manuel South, S. K. Regina, and Mary Bluechardt (2006). “Urban First Nations People with Disabilities Speak out.” Journal of Aboriginal Health September, 35.

Edwards, Claire (2001). “Inclusion in Regeneration: A Place for Disabled People?” Urban Studies 38, no. 2 (February 1): 267–86. doi:10.1080/00420980125583.

Fincher, Ruth (2003). “Planning for Cities of Diversity, Difference and Encounter”. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07293682.2003.9995252.

Friedner, Michele, and Jamie Osborne (2013). “Audit Bodies: Embodied Participation, Disability Universalism, and Accessibility in India.” Antipode, 45, no. 1: 43–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00990.x.

Gleeson, Brendan (2001). “Disability and the Open City.” Urban Studies 38, no. 2: 251–65.

Hall, Peter, and Rob Imrie (2014), Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. Taylor & Francis. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Wbk2149hXsEC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Rob+Imrie+History+of+Disability&ots=fQMwYgNM4x&sig=DLA6Bc5hRlNAxkrUzc8RWxflR_A.

Langdon, P. M., Jonathan Lazar, A. Heylighen, and H. Dong (2014). Inclusive Designing: Joining Usability, Accessibility, and Inclusion. Springer.

Marcuse, Peter, and Ronald Van Kempen (2011). Globalizing Cities. John Wiley & Sons. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qNGPJej9lskC&oi=fnd&pg=PT11&dq=globalizing+cities&ots=Qu6M0_gVGM&sig=ypwwfjP4KZSOg60g1ITVIgD_GFc.

Murray, William (1996). “Planning Residential Environments with Persons with Mental Retardation.” Journal of Planning Literature 11, no. 2 (November 1): 155–66. doi:10.1177/088541229601100201.

Pan, Haixiao (2011). “Implementing Sustainable Urban Travel Policies in China”. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/transport/implementing-sustainable-urban-travel-policies-in-china_5kg9mq40ldvg-en.

Plouffe, Louise, and Alexandre Kalache (2010). “Towards Global Age-Friendly Cities: Determining Urban Features That Promote Active Aging.” Journal of Urban Health 87, no. 5: 733–39.

Rattray, Nicholas A. (2013). “Contesting Urban Space and Disability in Highland Ecuador.” City & Society 25, no. 1: 25–46.

Robin, Hambleton (2014). Leading the Inclusive City: Place-Based Innovation for a Bounded Planet. Policy Press.

Sassen, Saskia (2011). Cities in a World Economy. Sage Publications. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=HdEgAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT13&dq=Cities+in+a+World+Econom+y&ots=ur0u2kcNs6&sig=13fuQTus6BBOjJKi5TSpy2ezBRU.

Shang, Xiaoyuan (2000). “Bridging the Gap between Planned and Market Economies: Employment Policies for People with Disabilities in Two Chinese Cities.” Disability & Society 15, no. 1: 135–56.

Ward, Margaret, and Jill Franz (2015). “The Provision of Visitable Housing in Australia: Down to the Detail.” Social Inclusion 3, no. 2: 31–43.

Whitehead, Graham, and Adam Barnard (2013). “Developing Inclusive Environments in Mental Health Provision for People with Disabilities.” The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 8, no. 2: 103–11.
Open Access Journal
ISSN 2206-9658