Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Dialogue, ambivalence, public space

Abstract

Public space is neither a fixed thing, nor a stable concept. This paper applies the term ‘dialogue’ as a conceptual basis for the idea of public space as something that changes according to multiscalar and overlapping contexts, with use and discourse. The concept of dialogue is developed from the dialogism of Mikhail Bakhtin whose related notions of ambivalence, polyphony, heteroglossia, carnival and chronotope are used to support a dialogical understanding of public space. The paper develops this understanding by creating a parallel between Bakhtin’s dialogism and the Barking Town Square by muf architecture/art (2004-2010). Through this parallel reading, the paper suggests that design proposals for the public realm are valued propositions that suggest a particular transformation of aesthetic, ethical, social and political relations through the ordering and transformation of spatial relations. No design, no conception, and therefore no dialogue creating public space can be neutral—but inevitably takes place within a fraught dialogical context inseparable from individual positioning and responsibility. The question of boundary maintenance thus arises inevitably, and the paper examines a range of such problematic demarcations, including between public and private, typologies and flexible criteria, immediate and social contexts, and ideals and reality. Given dialogue’s condition of ambivalence and incompleteness, the paper argues that the inherent contradictions to the concept of ‘public space’ are its very conditions for existence.

Published:
Pages:13 to 30
Section: Space
How to Cite
Kenniff, T.-B. (2018) “Dialogue, ambivalence, public space”, The Journal of Public Space, 3(1), pp. 13-30. doi: 10.5204/jps.v3i1.316.

Downloads

Total Abstract Views: 105  Total PDF Downloads: 88

Author Biography

Université du Québec à Montréal
Canada Canada

Thomas-Bernard Kenniff is Professor in the Environmental Design program at the École de design, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), where he teaches design studios, theory and criticism. He joined UQAM in 2015 after having taught in the architecture schools of Carleton University, Ottawa, Université de Montréal and Université Laval, Québec City. He holds a PhD in Architectural History and Theory from the UCL Bartlett School of Architecture and a Master of Architecture from the University of Waterloo, Canada. His research addresses preoccupations tied to the public realm, working out the ways in which subjectivities and relationships are transformed by the collective practice of making social space. He is currently working on a three-year design research project on the recent development of Montréal’s public realm that looks at how public space emerges from the multiple interfaces assembled between associations and individuals. Thomas-Bernard’s work on public space and design has developed through multiple lenses including dialogism, participant-research, oral history, urban identity, interstitial space and uncertainty. He is co-director, with Carole Lévesque, of the design research lab Bureau d’étude de pratiques indisciplinées.

References

Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810801933495.

Angles, M. (Ed.). (2010). In Favour of Public Space: Ten Years of the European Prize for Urban Public Space. Barcelona: Actar.

Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. (M. Holquist, Ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984a). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984b). Rabelais and His World. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. (M. Holquist & V. Liapunov, Eds). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). The Philosophy of the Act. (V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M., Voloshinov, V. N., & Medvedev, P. N. (1994). The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, and Voloshinov. (P. Morris, Ed.). London: E. Arnold.

Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary Public Space, Part Two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, 15(2), 157–173.

Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. A. (1992). Public space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Crang, M., & Thrift, N. J. (2000). Thinking space. London: Routledge.

Casarino, C., & Negri. A. (2008). In Praise of the Common: A Conversation on Philosophy and Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Farías, I. (2009). Decentring the Object of Urban Studies. In T. Bender & I. Farías (Eds), Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies (1st ed., pp. 1–24). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Folch-Serra, M. (1990). Place, voice, space: Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogical landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8, 255–274.

Fraser, M. (2012). Global Architectural Influences on London. Architectural Design: London (Re)Generation, 82(1), 14–21.

Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: a Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gardiner, M. (2000). Critiques of Everyday Life. Routledge.

Gardiner, M. (2004). Wild Publics and Grotesque Symposiums. In N. Crossley & J. M. Roberts (Eds), After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere (pp. 28–48). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Garvey, T. G. (2000). The Value of Opacity: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Habermas's Discourse Ethics. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 33(4), 370–390.

Habermas, J. (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hajer, M. A., & Reijndorp, A. (2001). In search of new public domain: analysis and strategy. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.

Hirschkop, K. (2002). Heteroglossia and Civil Society: Bakhtin’s Public Square and the Politics of Modernity. In M. Gardiner (Ed.), Mikhail Bakhtin (Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). London: SAGE.

Hirschkop, K. (2004). Justice and Drama: on Bakhtin as a Complement to Habermas. In N. Crossley & J. M. Roberts (Eds), After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere (pp. 49–66). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Holloway, J., & Kneale, J. (2000). Mikhail Bakhtin: dialogics of space. In N. J. Thrift & M. Crang (Eds), Thinking Space (pp. 71–88). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Kenniff, T.-B. (2011). Bakhtinian Dialogism as Framework for Participant Architectural Research. In P. Plowright & B. Gamper (Eds), Considering Research: Proceedings of the ARCC Spring Conference. Detroit, MI: Lawrence Technological University.

Kenniff, T.-B. (2013). Identity in Peripheries: Barking and its Others. In R. Morrow & M. Abdelmonem (Eds), Peripheries. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Kenniff, T.-B. (2016). Practical Ambivalence: A Dialogical Model for Design and Public Space. In K. Havik, J. Mejía Hernández, S. Oliveira, M. Proosten & M. Schäfer (Eds), Writingplace: Investigations in Architecture and Literature. Rotterdam: nai010 Publishers.

Koepnick, L. P. (1999). Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.

Kohn, M. (2004). Brave new neighborhoods: the privatization of public space. New York: Routledge.

Kujundzic, D. (2002). Laughter as Otherness in Bakhtin and Derrida. In M. Gardiner (Ed.), Mikhail Bakhtin (Vol. 4). London: SAGE.

LaCapra, D. (2003). Bakhtin, Marxism, and the Carnivalesque. In M. Gardiner (Ed.), Mikhail Bakhtin (Vol. 2, pp. 35–59). London: SAGE.

Lachmann, R., Eshelman, R., & Davis, M. (1988). Bakhtin and Carnival: Culture as Counter-Culture. Cultural Critique, 11, 115–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354246.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.

Nielsen, G. (1995). Bakhtin and Habermas: Toward a Transcultural Ethics. Theory and Society, 24(6), 803-835.

Paquot, T. (2009). L’espace public. Paris: La Découverte.

Roberts, J. M. (2004). John Stuart Mill, Free Speech and the Public Sphere: A Bakhtinian Critique. In N. Crossley & J. M. Roberts (Eds), After Habermas : new perspectives on the public sphere (pp. 67–87). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Roberts, J. M. (2008). Expressive Free Speech, the State and the Public Sphere: A Bakhtinian–Deleuzian Analysis of ‘Public Address’ at Hyde Park. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 2(7), 101–119.

Soja, E. W. (1980). The Socio-Spatial Dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 207–225.

Thornton, W. H. (1994). Cultural Prosaics as Counterdiscourse: A Direction for Cultural Studies after Bakhtin. Prose Studies, 17(2), 74–97.

Todorov, Z. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogic Principle. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Weintraub, J. (1997). The Public/Private Distinction. In J. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Weiss, W. (1990). Challenge to Authority: Bakhtin and Ethnographic Description. Cultural Anthropology, 5(4), 414–430.

Zima, P. (1981). L'Ambivalence dialectique: entre Benjamin et Bakhtine. Revue d’esthétique, 1, 131–140.
Open Access Journal
ISSN 2206-9658