Essi Oikarinen


An increasing amount of sub-Arctic population is living in cities and settlements. Despite the urbanisation, seasonality still affects the rhythm of life and willingness to spend time outside of home, which, in turn, affects health and wellbeing of the population. In addition to built artefacts, the materiality of sub-Arctic urban environment consists largely of changing weather conditions and seasonality, including phenomena such as thawing, freezing, snow, ice and slush, which have diverse effects on humans using the urban spaces, yet are not often part of conceptualisations of urban space that are formed in southern climates. In this paper, the relationship between sub-Arctic urban form, climate and users of the urban realm is critically re-evaluated using the concept of surface. Based on a review of the literature, the proposed approach gives agency not only to the weather, but also to different types of people inhabiting the urban space. This paper argues that the proposed approach takes better into account the varied nature of sub-Arctic urban spaces and their affordances as an entity: from privatised, roofed and weather-neutralised shopping centres and arcades to sledding hills, skating rinks and other winter-related spaces. This kind of conceptualisation could be beneficial when developing soft mobility plans for northern regions. Encouraging physical activity has direct effects on the physiological health of the population, but in addition to that, the approach attempts to acknowledge personal control of different user groups as a central aspect of wellbeing, which makes the viewpoint more holistic.


How to Cite
Oikarinen, E. (2020) “Roofing and thawing the sub-Arctic city: Towards the conceptualisation of wellbeing through urban surfaces”, The Journal of Public Space, 5(2), pp. 45–62. doi: 10.32891/jps.v5i2.1281.
Author Biography

Essi Oikarinen, University of Oulu

Essi Oikarinen is a PhD student in urban design researching the intersections between weather events, urban everyday life and architectural design process, with a focus on built environments in sub-Arctic and Arctic climate zones.


99% Invisible (2019). Episode 363: Invisible Women. Online article. Accessed 27 Apr 2020, https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/invisible-women/.

Anusas, M and Ingold T. (2013). Designing Environmental Relations: From Opacity to Textility. Design Issues, 29, 4, pp. 58-69.

Biehler, D D, Simon, G L. (2010). The Great Indoors: Research frontiers on indoor environments as active political-ecological spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 2, pp. 172–192.

Boddy, T. (1992). Underground and Over Head. Building the Analogous City. Variations on a Theme Park (Sorkin, M, ed). 4th edition. New York, Hill & Wang.

Brown, K M. (2015). Leave only footprints? How traces of movement shape the appropriation of space. Cultural Geographies, 22, 4, pp. 659-687.

Carmona, M, Heath, T, Oc, T, & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Urban Spaces – Public Places: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford, Architectural Press.

Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary Public Space: Critique and Classification, Part One: Critique, Journal of Urban Design, 15, 1, pp. 123–148.

de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, University of California Press. (Originally published in French as L'invention du quotidien. Vol. 1, Arts de faire, 1980)

Chapman, D. (2018). Urban Design of Winter Cities: Winter Season Connectivity for Soft Mobility. PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology.

Chapman, D; Nilsson, K, Larsson, A, & Rizzo, A. (2017). Climatic barriers to soft-mobility in winter: Luleå, Sweden as case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35 (Nov), pp. 574-580.

Chapman, D, Larsson, A. (2019). Toward an Integrated Model for Soft Mobility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 10, p. 1820.

Chapman, D, Nilsson, K L, Rizzo, A & Larsson, A. (2019). Winter City Urbanism: Enabling All Year Connectivity for Soft Mobility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 10.

Chiodelli, F & Moroni, S. (2015). Do malls contribute to the privatisation of public space and the erosion of the public sphere? Reconsidering the role of shopping centres. City, Culture and Society, 6, pp. 35–42.

City of Edmonton. (2012). Winter Design Guidelines: Transforming Edmonton into a Great Winter City.

City of Oulu. (2014). Talvikaupunkistrategia. Hiukkavaaran keskus – kestävä pohjoinen talvikaupunki. Oulun kaupunkisuunnittelu, sarja b 46. Accessed 27 Apr 2020, https://www.ouka.fi/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=6e723047-0378-450b-ad62-5c4fd5e32ae3&groupId=139863

Clark, C & Uzzell, D. (2002). The affordances of the home, neighborhood, school and town center for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, pp. 95–108.

Eliasson, I. (2000). The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, pp. 31-44.

Eliasson, I, Knez, I, Westerberg, U, Throsson, S & Lindberg, F. (2007). Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82, pp. 72–84.

Ebrahimabadi, S. (2015). Outdoor Comfort in Cold Climates. Integrating Microclimate Factors in Urban Design. PhD Thesis. Luleå University of Technology.

Ebrahimabadi, S; Nilsson, K & Johansson, C. (2015). The Problems of Addressing Microclimate Factors in Urban Planning of the Subarctic Regions. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 42, 3, pp. 415-430.

Evans, G W & McCoy, J M. (1998). When buildings don’t work: the role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, pp. 85–94.

Eriksson, M & Lindström, B. (2007). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale and It’s relation with quality of life: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, pp. 938-944.

Forsyth, I, Lorimer, H, Merriman, P & Robinson, J. (2013). What are surfaces? Environment and Planning A, 45, 5, pp. 1013-1020.

Gehl, J. (1971). Life between buildings – Using public space. Washington DC, Island Press, 2011.

Gibson, J J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York, Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions 2015.

Grahn, P & Stigsdotter, U K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94, 3–4, pp. 264–275.

Ingold, T. (2017). Surface Visions, Theory, Culture & Society, 34, 7–8, pp. 99–108.

Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an Ecology of Materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, pp. 427–442.

Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints through the weather-world: walking, breathing, knowing, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), pp. 121-139

Jauhiainen, J S & Mönkkönen, M. (2005). Seasonality: Nature, People's Preferences and Urban Planning in Oulunsalo, Finland, Landscape Research, 30, 2, pp. 273-281.

Kohl, H W et al. (2012). Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group, The pandemic of physical inactivity: Global action for public health, Lancet, 380, pp. 294-305.

Kuismanen, K. (2008). Climate conscious architecture design and wind testing method for changing climates. PhD Thesis, University of Oulu.

Labadini, A. (2017). Immaterial landscapes: Formulating the Intangible in Northern Landscapes. PhD Thesis, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design.

Lefebvre, H. (1992). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. Bloomsbury Academic.

Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (1991). The Production of Space (vol. 142). Oxford, Blackwell.

Lenzholzer, S. (2010). Designing Atmospheres. Research and Design for Thermal Comfort in Dutch Urban Squares. PhD Thesis, Netherlands Research School for the Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment (SENSE).

Lenzholzer, S. (2012). A city is not a building – architectural concepts for public square design in Dutch urban climate contexts, Journal of Landscape Architecture, 3, 1, pp. 44-55.

Li, S. (1994). Users' Behaviour of Small Urban Spaces in Winter and Marginal Seasons. Architecture and Behavior, 10, 1, pp. 95–109.

Pressman, N. (1996). Sustainable winter cities: Future directions for planning, policy and design, Atmospheric Environment, 30, pp. 521-529.

Loughran, K. (2016). Imbricated Spaces: The High Line, Urban Parks, and the Cultural Meaning of City and Nature, Sociological Theory, 34, 4, pp. 311–334.

Maier, J R A, Fadel, G M & Battisto, D G. (2009), An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30, pp. 393-414.

Mäkinen, T M. (2007). Human cold exposure, adaptation and performance in high latitude environments, American Journal of Human Biology, 19, pp. 155-164.

Roesler, S. (2016). The Urban Microclimate as Artefact: Reassessing Climate and Culture Studies in Architecture and Anthropology, Architectural Theory Review, 21, 1, pp. 73-88.

Thompson Coon, J, Boddy, K, Stein, K, Whear, R, Barton, J & Depledge, M H. (2011). Does Participating in Physical Activity in Outdoor Natural Environments Have a Greater Effect on Physical and Mental Wellbeing than Physical Activity Indoors? A Systematic Review, Environmental Science and Technology, 45, pp. 1761–1772.

Thorsson, S, Honjo, T, Lindberg, F, Eliasson, I & Lim, E-M. (2007). Thermal comfort and outdoor activity in Japanese urban public places, Environment and Behavior, 39, 5, pp. 660-684.

United Nations. (2016). New Urban Agenda. Adopted at the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) in Quito, Ecuador, on 20 October 2016.

Volker, S & Kistemann, T. (2011). The impact of blue space on human health and well-being – Salutogenetic health effects of inland surface waters: A review, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 214, pp. 449–460.

Watson, S. (2017). Liquid passions: bodies, publics and city waters, Social & Cultural Geography, 20, 7, pp. 960-980.

Westerberg, U. (2009). The significance of climate for the use of urban outdoor spaces: Some results from case studies in two Nordic cities, International Journal of Architectural Research (IJAR), 3, 1, pp. 131-144.

Younger, M, Morrow-Almeida, H R, Vindigni, S M & Dannenberg, A L. (2008). The Built Environment, Climate Change, and Health. Opportunities for Co-Benefit, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 5, pp. 517-526.