##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Zara Stanhope

Abstract

The photographic work of Aotearoa New Zealand artist Edith Amituanai generates the confident self-assertion of publics that potentially shifts misperceptions of people and place for both subjects and their audiences. A belief in service, a characteristic legacy of Amituanai’s Sāmoan family background has led her to document people, particularly diverse diaspora communities, in the western suburbs of Auckland city where she also lives, and to documenting people more broadly in their neighbourhoods or personal environments. Her images have enabled largely unnoticed and hence provisional publics associated with disregarded public spaces to see themselves presented in mainstream society in art galleries, publications and social media, thereby potentially shifting the stereotypes of people and local places to aid a more complete depiction of a society beyond the dominant European settler demographic. Amituanai’s images of youth, family, cultural and interest group communities and those connected with educational institutions convey the multiple associations that connect individuals. While these associations can be aligned with Grant Kester’s concept of politically coherent communities’ or Michael Warner’s ‘counterpublics’ I argue that the people visible in Amituanai’s work or who take agency to respond to her photos are making themselves publics on their own terms, creating publics that are equal to any other public. The activation of public identity that claims shared space has occurred during the institutional exhibition of Amituanai’s images where subjects and visitors respond to photographs in demonstrations of their own agency.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Stanhope, Z. (2020) “Photographing Moments to be Seen: Edith Amituanai’s Little Publics”, The Journal of Public Space, 5(4), pp. 177–192. doi: 10.32891/jps.v5i4.1424.
Section
Portfolio
Author Biography

Zara Stanhope, Govett-Brewster Art Gallery / Len Lye Centre (GBAG / LLC)

As a curator practising within institutions and independently Zara Stanhope focuses on expanding collaborative engagement with contemporary art across the Global South. She is Curatorial Manager, Asian and Pacific Art at Queensland Art Gallery|Gallery of Modern Art (QAGOMA), Australia where she is the lead curator for the 10th Asia Pacific Triennial for 2021 and Unfinished Business: The Art Of Gordon Bennett (2020). She led the 9th Asia Pacific Triennial in 2018, and was Lead Curator for Dane Mitchell’s Post hoc, New Zealand’s artist at Venice at the 58th La Biennale di Venezia (2019). She has curated and co-curated numerous other exhibitions in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand and is a regular contributor on contemporary art and curatorial practices to art magazines and journals. She was commissioning editor of Dane Mitchell: Post hoc, Mousse Publishing (2019), Ann Shelton: Dark Matter, Auckland Art Gallery and The Māori Portraits: Gottfried Lindauer’s New Zealand, co-edited with Ngahiraka Mason, Auckland University Press (both 2016) and of the peer-reviewed symposium papers Artmatter 01: Engaging Publics/Public Engagement, Auckland Art Gallery (AAG) and AUT University (2014); and Artmatter 2: Agency and Aesthetics, co-edited with Ann Shelton, AAGToT and Massey University (2018) and for a Massey University Press publication on the work of Anne Noble (2021).

References

Anae, M; Coxon, E & Mara, D. (2001). Pasifika Education Research Guidelines: Report to the Ministry of Education, Wellington, Auckland Uniservices Limited.

Amituanai, E. (2020). interview. 3 July.

The Big Idea Editor, ‘Photographer Edith Amituanai’, The Big Idea, 23 September 2009, Accessed 17 June 2020, https://www.thebigidea.nz/news/tbi-qna/60832-photographer-edith-amituanai.

Arden, H. (2014). Participatory art and the impossible public. Art and the Public Sphere, 3.2, pp 103–117.

Brownson, R. (2018). The Ground-breaking Achievements of Edith Amituanai’s Participatory Photography Project: #keeponkimiora, Keep on Kimi Ora, exhibition catalogue, Hastings Art Gallery, Hastings, New Zealand, p.10.

Chu, C. (2006). Pasifika in Peters. M.A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Singapore, Springer. Accessed 5 August 2020, https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-981-287-532-7_11-1.pdf.

Daldy, B; Poot, J & Rokskruge, M. (2013), Perception of Workplace Discrimination Among Immigrants and Native Born New Zealanders, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 16, 1, pp. 137–154.

Delanty, G. (2012). Community. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–12.

Desai, D & Darts, D. (2016). Interrupting everyday life: Public interventionist art as critical public pedagogy. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(2), 183–195.

Deutsche, R. (1996). Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics, Cambridge, MA, and London, MIT Press, pp. 279–90.

du Fresne, K. Flaxmere: Turning a Town Around, The Listener. 13 July 2016, Accessed 24 August 2020, https://www.noted.co.nz/currently/currently-social-issues/flaxmere-turning-a-town-around.

Grainger, A. (2009). Rugby, Pacific Peoples, and the Cultural Politics of National Identity in New Zealand, The International Journal of the History of Sport. 26, 16, pp. 2335-2357, Accessed 17 June 2020, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09523360903466776?src=recsys&journalCode=fhsp20.

Graves, J.B. (2005). Cultural Democracy: The Arts, Community, and the Public Purpose. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, p. 25.

Habermas, J. (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of the Bourgeois, trans. Thomas Berger and Frederick Lawrence 1989, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991.

Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Youth, Arts and Education: Reassembling Subjectivity through Affect. New York, Routledge, p. 19.

Kester, Grant H. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2004.

New Zealand Bureau of Statistics Tatauranga Aotearoa 2013, Census Ethnic Group Profiles: Samoan, Accessed 17 June 2020, http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/ethnic-profiles.aspx?request_value=24708&parent_id=24706&tabname=#24708&gsc.tab=0.

New Zealand Bureau of Statistics Tatauranga Aotearoa 2013, Demographics of New Zealand’s Pacific Population, Accessed 17 June 2020, http://archive.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/pacific_peoples/pacific-progress-demography/population-growth.aspx#gsc.tab=0.

New Zealand Bureau of Statistics Tatauranga Aotearoa 2018, Census population and dwelling counts, Accessed 23 August 2020, https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/2018-census-population-and-dwelling-counts
New Zealand Bureau of Statistics Tatauranga Aotearoa 2020, Population, Accessed 30 August 2020, https://www.stats.govt.nz/topics/population.

Salesa, D. (2017). Island Time: New Zealand’s Pacific Futures. Wellington, New Zealand, Bridget Williams Books.

Sorensen, D & Jensen, S. (2017). Pasifika People in New Zealand, Auckland, Pasifika futures.

Spoonley, P. (2011, revised 2018). Ethnic and religious intolerance – Intolerance towards Pacific migrants, Te Ara, The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed 4 July 2020, https://teara.govt.nz/en/ethnic-and-religious-intolerance/page-4.

Thomson, S, Tavita, J & Levi-Teu, Z. A Pacific Perspective on the Living Standards Framework and Wellbeing, Wellington, New Zealand Treasury. Accessed 17 June 2020, https://treasury.govt.nz/publications/dp/dp-18-09.

Warner, M. (2005). Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.