Remember and Reuse: Spatial Memory and Emotional Value of Post-socialist Public Spaces
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The legacy of socialist architecture and urban planning in Europe is worthy of attention not only from the point of view of its historical significance but also in the context of modern “culture wars” or “memory wars,” which are a recognizable feature of modern socio-political life. Using the example of a specific location, the Ernst-Thälmann-Park in Berlin, the article examines the problem of perception of this heritage of European urbanism of the 20th century. This location in eastern Berlin remains the subject of residents' emotional experiences and discussions about the memory of the place revolves around both the demolished gas storage buildings, on the site of which a park was created during the socialist era and the central square with its monument. Nowadays, the residential area with the central square is popular among the locals, combining symbolic and practical aspects.
It is emphasised that within the framework of socialist urbanism, the creation of public spaces received considerable attention. This was rooted in the ideological foundations of the socialist system: the dominance of the public over the individual and the values of centrally organized social practices. The collapse of the Eastern Bloc resulted in numerous transformations in political institutions, in the economy, in social relations. These transformations also impacted strategies and practices in urban planning, construction and architecture: the planned economy was replaced by free market, and ideological foundations blurred. At the same time, “places and spaces of memory” emotionally linked to the socialist era are being revised, and the discussion on the value of this architecture is going on. The spatial aspects of this debate are particularly evident in urban environments, given the high diversity of urban communities and the specific nature of urban life: politically competitive and agonistic.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
AnwohnerInitiative Ernst-Thälmann-Park. Wie wollen wir hier leben? (2026) https://thaelmannpark.wordpress.com/denkmalschutz/ (accessed: 15.03.2026).
Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space / transl. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Barša, P., Hesová, Z., and Slačálek, O. (eds.). (2021) Central European Culture Wars: Beyond Post-communism and Populism. Prague: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy.
Belci, D., and Tirell, D. (2011) Timisoara: The Historic City as a Starting Point for Post-communist Sustainable Urban Development. City and Time. N 5(1). P. 43–47.
Bell, D. (2008). Agonistic Democracy and the Politics of Memory. Constellations, 15(1), pp. 148‒166.
Benjamin, W. (1986). Moscow Diary. Gary Smith (ed.), transl. Richard Sieburth. Harvard University Press.
Benjamin, W. (2019). Berliner Kindheit um neunzehnhundert. OK Publishing.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power [Transl. from French]. Sociological Theory, 7(1), pp. 14–25.
Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? City, 13(2), pp. 198-207.
Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., and Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15(2), pp. 225-240.
Brünenberg, S., and Engler, H. (2023) ‘Bauen und Planen im Kollektiv: Architekt:innen und die Ostmoderne’ in F. Bußmann, and D. Kopka (eds.). Matrix Ostmoderne: Ostmoderne: Bauen, baubezogene Kunst und Formgestaltung in Ostdeutschland und dem Europa der Nachkriegszeit. Aurora—Chemnitzer Schriften zu Kunst und Kultur, 3, pp. 104–117.
Čamprag, N. (2019) ‘Identity Struggle in Post-socialist City: Re-Imagineering Belgrade, Remodeling Skopje’ in Doğan, E. (ed). Reinventing Eastern Europe: Imaginaries, Identities and Transformations. Transnational Press: London, pp. 95–114.
Certeau, M. de. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life / transl. by S. Rendall. University of California Press.
Dellenbaugh-Losse, M. (2020) Inventing Berlin: Architecture, Politics and Cultural Memory in the New/Old German Capital Post-1989. Cham, Springer.
Der Ernst-Thälmann-Park: Komplexe Planungen für ein Prestigeprojekt. (2024) http://thaelmann-park.berlin/ (accessed: 12.03.2026).
DeTurk, S. (2017). Memory of absence: Contemporary counter-monuments. Art and the Public Sphere, 6(1), pp. 81–94.
Die 16 Grundsätze des Städtebaus (2005) https://www.bpb.de/themen/nachkriegszeit/wiederaufbau-der-staedte/64346/die-16-grundsaetze-des-staedtebaus/ (accessed: 15.03.2026)
Diener, A. C., and Hagen, J. (2013) From Socialist to Post-socialist Cities: Narrating the Nation Through Urban Space. Nationalities Papers, 41(4), pp. 487–514.
Diener, A. C., and Hagen, J. (eds.). (2015) From Socialist to Post-Socialist Cities: Cultural Politics of Architecture, Urban Planning, and Identity in Eurasia. (1st ed.). L., NY: Routledge.
Doğan, E. (ed.). (2019) Reinventing Eastern Europe: Imaginaries, Identities and Transformations. L.: Transnational Press.
Erläuterungen zum Vorliegen der Merkmale eines Denkmals nach § 2 DSchG Bln vom 24.5.95. (2014) https://thaelmannpark.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ernst-thc3a4lmann-siedlung-denkmalbegrc3bcndung.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2026).
Ernst Thälmann. Der Mythos hinter dem Denkmal. (2026) https://youtu.be/GeRftHjs6aM (accessed: 11.03.2026).
Ernst-Thälmann-Park. (2026) Parks und Naturgebiete in Pankow. URL: https://www.pankow-weissensee-prenzlauerberg.berlin/de/ernst-thaelmann-park (accessed: 15.03.2026).
Ernst-Thälmann-Park: der Viele-Generationen-Park. (2021) https://www.sowohntberlin.de/mein-kiez/ernst-thaelmann-park-nachbarschaft/ (accessed: 19.03.2026).
Etwas zur Geschichte des Ernst-Thälmann-Park Areals. (2026) https://thaelmannpark.wordpress.com/geschichte/ (accessed: 5.03.2026).
Forrester, S., Zaborowska, M. J., and Gapova, E. (eds.). (2004) Over the Wall / After the Fall: Post-Communist Cultures Through an East-West Gaze. Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
Frost, I. (2018) Exploring Varieties of (post)Soviet Urbanization: Reconciling the General and Particular in post-Socialist Urban Studies. Europa Regional, 25, pp. 2–14.
Gelazis, N., Czaplicka, J., and Ruble B. A. (eds.). (2009) Cities after the Fall of Communism: Reshaping Cultural Landscapes and European Identity. Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D. (2008) The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53, pp. 23–40.
Hirt, S. (2005) Planning the Post-communist City: Experiences from Sofia. International Planning Studies, 10(3–4), pp. 219–240.
Hirt, S., and Stanilov, K. (2009) Twenty Years of Transition: The Evolution of Urban Planning in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 1989–2009. Nairobi: Un-Habitat.
Historical Critical Commentary on the Thälmann Monument. Bezirksamt Pankow von Berlin, Amt für Weiterbildung und Kultur: Museum Pankow. (2023), https://www.berlin.de/museum-pankow/geschichte-vor-ort/gedenktafeln/2023/artikel.1505049.en.php (accessed: 5.03.2026).
Hubner, E., and Dirksmeier, P. (2023). Geography of placemories: deciphering spatialised memories. cultural geographies, 30(1), pp. 103–121.
Ilchenko, M. (2019) Discourse of Modernist Heritage and New Ways of Thinking about Socialist Urban Areas in Eastern Europe. Changing Societies and Personalities, 3(3), pp. 243–257.
Kołodziejczyk, D., and Şandru, C. (2016) Postcolonial Perspectives on Postcommunism in Central and Eastern Europe. L., NY: Routledge.
Kopelyansky, D. (1970) Cities and Urban Centers in the GDR: Review. Architecture of the USSR, 7, pp. 53. (in Russian).
Kuntzsch, B. (2021) Thinking from the Pedestal Art Project. URL: https://www.vomsockeldenken.de/en/p0/ (accessed: 18.03.2026).
Kuznetsova, M.I. (2024) Architectural and urban utopias of the 1950s-1970s in the soviet and foreign urban planning theory: an analytical review. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 1(66), pp. 91–100. URL: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2024/1kvart24/PDF/07_kusnetsova.pdf (in Russian)
Lefebvre, H. (1968) Le droit à la ville. Collection Société et Urbanisme. Paris: Anthropos.
Lefebvre, H. (1981). La Production de l'Espace. P.: Editions Anthropos.
Low, S. (2000) On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Low, S. (2017) Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. L., NY: Routledge.
Madgin, R. (2025) Why Historic Places Matter Emotionally. Cambridge University Press.
Madgin, R., and Kenny, N. (eds.). (2022) The City as Place. Peter Lang Ltd, International Academic Publishers.
Massino, J., and Wien, M. (eds.). (2024) Everyday Postsocialism in Eastern Europe: History Doesn't Travel in One Direction. Purdue University Press.
Meissner, K. (2025) ‘Remaining Visible: The Visual Trajectory of a Demolished Gasometer in the Conflicting Discourses about Socialist Heritage in the former East Berlin since the 1970s’ in Birgit Knauer, Laura Demeter (eds.) Transforming Cities: Planning and Preserving in Historic Urban Contexts. TU Wien Academic Press, pp. 161–183.
Mitchell, D. (2003) The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford press.
Mitchell, D. (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. Guilford Press.
Mouffe, Ch. (2005) On the Political. L.: Routledge.
Mouffe, Ch. (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. L., NY: Verso.
Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, pp. 7–24.
Peter, E. (2022) Betonköpfe in Pankow. taz.de. https://taz.de/CDU-will-Abriss-von-Thaelmann-Denkmal/!5839152/ (accessed: 12.03.2026)
Petrov, V. (1970) Monuments of monumental propaganda. Architecture of the USSR, 3, pp. 56–61. (in Russian).
Polese, A., Morris, J., Pawłusz , E., and Seliverstova, O. (eds.). (2018) Identity and Nation Building in Everyday Post-Socialist Life. L., NY: Routledge.
Poljak Istenič, S., and Kozina, J. (2020) ‘Participatory Planning in a Post-socialist Urban Context: Experience from Five Cities in Central and Eastern Europe’ in Nared, J., Bole, D. (eds.). Participatory Research and Planning in Practice. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham, pp. 31–50.
Pucherová, D., and Gáfrik, R. (eds.). (2015) Postcolonial Europe? Essays on Post-Communist Literatures and Cultures. Leiden–Boston: Brill–Rodopi.
Pugh, E. (2014) Architecture, Politics and Identity in Divided Berlin. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Revisited. Visiting Apartment Buildings of the 1980. Ernst-Thälmann-Park housing estate. Berlinische Galerie. (2026) https://berlinischegalerie.de/en/revisited/ernst-thaelman-park/ (accessed: 15.03.2026).
Rossi, U. (2019) Critical Urban Theory. In: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Ed. by Anthony Orum. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Sanoff, H. (2010) Democratic Design. Participation Case Studies in Urban and Small Town Environments. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
Sharova, V. (2021) The Problem of Proportionality between Human and City in the Context of the Architecture of Soviet Modernism. Chelovek, 32(1), pp. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.31857/S023620070014181-6 (in Russian)
Sharova, V. (2022a) Post-socialist City: Visual Experience of Everyday Life as a Factor in Nation-building. Polylogos. 6(1),https://doi.org/10.18254/S258770110018979-8 (in Russian)
Sharova, V. (2022b) The city as a Palimpsest: The Phenomenon of “Empty Places” in the Urban Environment. Polylogos. 6(3), https://doi.org/10.18254/S258770110022905-7 (in Russian)
Sharova, V., and Letnyakov, D. (2023) The City as Polis: Agonistic Practices in the Urban Environment. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 26(4), pp. 136‒162. (in Russian).
Stanilov, K. (ed). (2007) The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Springer; University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
Stevens, Q., Franck, K. A., & Fazakerley, R. (2012). Counter-monuments: the anti-monumental and the dialogic. The Journal of Architecture, 17(6), pp. 951–972.
Stevens, Q., Franck, K. A., & Fazakerley, R. (2018). Counter-monuments: the anti-monumental and the dialogic, The Journal of Architecture, 23(5), pp. 718‒739.
Therborn, G. (2017) Cities of Power: The Urban, The National, The Popular, The Global. NY: Verso.
Tomberger, C. (2010) The Counter-Monument: Memory Shaped by Male Post-War Legacies. In: Niven, B., Paver, C. (eds) Memorialization in Germany since 1945. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 224–232.
Vor Ort im Prenzlauer Berg: Der Ernst-Thälmann-Park—Geschichte and Sanierungsbedarf. (2026) rbb. https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/der-tag-in-berlin-und-brandenburg/vor-ort-im-prenzlauer-berg-der-ernst-thaelmann-park-geschichte-und-sanierungsbedarf/rbb/Y3JpZDovL3JiYl84MDI1YzY2Yi04ZTUxLTRlOWEtYTU1Mi00OTFmOTZlNWMzNmJfcHVibGljYXRpb24 (accessed: 15.03.2026).
Wildwest im Thälmannpark. (2019) https://vimeo.com/360546930 (accessed: 18.03.2026).
Young, J. E. (1992). The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today. Critical Inquiry. 18(2), pp. 267‒296.
