##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Rizqa Hidayani
Nayaka Angger
Bisma Setiady
Melania Alvianti Sumaryata
Bima Pratama Putra
Kesuma Anugerah Yanti

Abstract

This paper examines how community-centric design processes influence the sustainability of neighbourhood-scale public spaces through the lens of perceived ownership and stewardship practices. While participatory approaches are widely promoted in public space development, their contribution to the long-term maintenance and care that contribute to the sustainability of the space remains insufficiently discussed. Building on insights from ‘collective ownership’ literature that links perceived ownership to stewardship behaviours in shared environments, the study investigates how these dynamics unfold in practice. Drawing on two neighbourhood-scale public space projects co-designed with local communities in Indonesia, Sungai Jingah (Banjarmasin, 2012) and Mangkubumen (Surakarta, 2022), the paper explores how participatory processes that were designed to facilitate community aspirations and build ownership are translated into patterns of use, social inclusion, and maintenance. The paper adopts qualitative, practice-based research approaches, combining in-depth semi-structured interviews with reflective process, field observations and project archives on impact assessments. The findings show that community-centric design contributes most to the usership and inclusivity of the space, ensuring that the design of spaces reflects the needs of the user. Although the participatory process facilitates the emergence of ownership and stewardship practice, the result is highly context dependent. Ownership and stewardship practice does not automatically emerge from participation but develops through a combination of various factors such as interest, control over the space, attachment and familiarity, and investments, mediated by factors such as tenure stability, social cohesion, governance arrangements, and access to resources. While stewardship practices emerge through community initiative, their continuity often depends on larger institutional support. This paper proposed a process-based evaluation framework that not only focuses on the design process of the space but also covers aspects that nurture the sustainability of the space, particularly by facilitating the ownership building and stewardship practices that contribute to the sustainability of small-scale public spaces.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Hidayani, R., Angger, N., Setiady, B., Sumaryata, M. A., Putra, B. P. and Yanti, K. A. (2026) “Unfolding Process-Based Indicators: Linking Participation, Perceived Ownership, and Stewardship Practice to Public Space Sustainability: Reflections from Neighbourhood-scale Public Spaces in Surakarta and Banjarmasin, Indonesia”, The Journal of Public Space, 11(1), pp. 115–140. doi: 10.32891/jps.v11i1.1903.
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rizqa Hidayani, MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Rizqa Hidayani is an urban planner whose work focuses on advancing inclusivity and resilience in urban development. She believes that cities should be built for and with the people who inhabit them, and that planning processes should accommodate their voices and bring benefits to the most vulnerable groups in the city. Her work promotes participatory approaches to urban planning through community-centric design, action research, and collaboration with local governments and communities. Her experience is grounded in her role as Senior Program Manager at Kota Kita Foundation, where she has worked in more than ten cities across Indonesia on urban resilience projects. In 2022, she led the implementation of the Kali Pepe inclusive riverbank public space project in Mangkubumen, Solo, Indonesia, funded by the UN-Habitat Public Space Programme.
She is a 2025-2026 Hubert H. Humphrey Fellow in the Special Program for Urban and Regional Studies (SPURS), Department of Urban Studies and Planning (DUSP), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where she explores inclusive pathways toward climate-resilient cities, with a particular focus on heat adaptation. Rizqa holds a BSc and MSc in Urban and Regional Planning from Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Nayaka Angger, Kota Kita Foundation

Nayaka Angger (Angger) is a Knowledge and Learning Manager at Kota Kita Foundation, a non-profit organization based in Solo, Indonesia, that promotes and facilitates the participation of all citizens in shaping cities. He holds a BE in Urban and Regional Planning from the Institute of Technology Bandung (ITB). His research-action projects focus on urban resilience, disaster risk reduction, food systems, regenerative built environments, the climate-technology nexus, and coastal communities in various Indonesian cities. He is currently heading the organizational knowledge management to capture thematic insights across divisions and transform them into actionable knowledge products.

Bisma Setiady, Kota Kita Foundation

A researcher with a background in architecture and development studies, experienced in conducting field-based research, managing data collection processes, and analyzing social and spatial dynamics across diverse contexts. His work focuses on generating evidence to support policy development, program design, and community-centered interventions.
With experience collaborating with multidisciplinary teams and engaging diverse stakeholders, he brings strong analytical, research coordination, and knowledge management skills. His interests include urban development, housing, resilience, vulnerability assessment, and the application of data-driven approaches to development challenges.

Melania Alvianti Sumaryata, Kota Kita Foundation

Melania Alvianti is an Urban Designer, as well as Program Officer for the Urban Inclusivity Team at Kota Kita. Melania specializes in inclusive and sustainable urban planning and design through a participatory approach with vulnerable groups. At Kota Kita, she is involved in several collaborative programs, including the UK PACT program with ARUP on low-carbon mobility; Streets for Kids (SUKARIA) with GDCI and Transportation Agency in Surakarta; and the Surakarta Space Shapers program with UNAOC, BMW Group, and Accenture, which focuses on child-friendly public spaces. She is also actively involved in other initiatives that promote the development of inclusive cities, including the Inclusive-Disability City Profile, guidelines on accessibility and universal design of public space in Makassar, and strengthening inclusive economic communities in Solo Raya. Melania holds a Master's degree in Urban Design from Institut Teknologi Bandung and has a Bachelor's background in Architectural Engineering. She is also a Placemaking Fellow in the Australia Awards Fellowship program and a professional member of the Indonesian Urban Design Experts Association (IARKI).

Bima Pratama Putra, Kota Kita Foundation

Bima has over 15 years of experience leading participatory design initiatives with a community-centric approach at Kota Kita. He has worked across more than 25 cities in Indonesia, developing many creative co-design tools and methods to strengthen community participation and social inclusion while collaborating closely with local governments. His international experience includes projects in Bangladesh, Mongolia, and the Solomon Islands, as well as collaborations with institutions such as UN-Habitat, UNDP, the World Bank, the Asia Foundation, and the Ford Foundation.

Kesuma Anugerah Yanti, Borneo Urban Lab

Kesuma Anugerah Yanti is an urban practitioner specializing in climate resilience, urban governance, and community-led development. With extensive experience working across Indonesia, she focuses on translating technical knowledge into practical and locally grounded solutions that support climate adaptation, sustainable urban development, and inclusive planning.
She has collaborated with local governments, international organizations, and development partners to strengthen climate-responsive urban strategies. In her previous work, she supported cities including Banjarmasin, Samarinda, Bandar Lampung, and Cirebon in developing GHG inventories, climate risk assessments, climate action plans, and bankable climate projects.
As the Founder of Borneo Urban Lab she leads initiatives on urban inclusivity, environmental sustainability, disaster risk reduction, circular economy, and youth empowerment. Her expertise includes community facilitator, stakeholder engagement, and project management.

References

Arnstein, S.R. (1969) ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224.

Blomley, N. (2004) Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.

Carmona, M., et al. (2003) Public places, urban spaces. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Carmona, M., de Magalhães, C. and Hammond, L. (2008) Public space: the management dimension. London: Routledge.

Carmona, M. (2019) ‘Principles for public space design, planning to do better’, Urban Design International, 24, pp. 47–59.

Collins, K. and Ison, R. (2009) ‘Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation’, Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(6), pp. 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.523

Cornwall, A. (2002) Making Spaces, Changing Places: Situating Participation in Development. IDS Working Paper 170. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

Chung, M. (2025) ‘Our park, our community: Exploring psychological ownership in public open spaces’, Leisure Sciences, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2025.2464571

Davidoff, P. (1965) ‘Advocacy and pluralism in planning’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), pp. 331–338.

Fals-Borda, O. and Rahman, M.A. (eds.) (1991) Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York: Apex Press.

Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gehl, J. (2011) Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Hester, R.T. (1990) Community design primer. Mendocino, CA: Ridge Times Press.

Han, S., Song, D., Xu, L. et al. (2022) ‘Behaviour in public open spaces: A systematic review of studies with quantitative research methods’, Building and Environment, 223, p. 109444.

Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (eds.) (2004) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed Books.

Lefebvre, H. (1996) ‘The right to the city’, in Kofman, E. and Lebas, E. (eds.) Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 63–181.

Madanipour, A. (2015). ‘Urban Design and Public Space’, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.74049-9

Madanipour, A. (2017) Cities in time: Temporary urbanism and the future of the city. London: Bloomsbury.

Mehta, V. (2014) ‘Evaluating public space’, Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), pp. 53–88.

Miraftab, F. (2004) ‘Invited and invented spaces of participation: Neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics’, Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s and Gender Studies, 1, pp. 1–7.

Mullenbach, L.E., Baker, B.L., Benfield, J.A., Hickerson, B. and Mowen, A.J. (2019) ‘Assessing the relationship between community engagement and perceived ownership of an urban park in Philadelphia’, Journal of Leisure Research, 50(3), pp. 201–219.

Peck, J., Sene-Harper, A. and Wallace, L. (2021) ‘Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(4), pp. 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156211000940

Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. and Dirks, K.T. (2001) ‘Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp. 298–310.

Roy, A. (2005) ‘Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), pp. 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689

Sanoff, H. (2000) Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sendra, P. and Fitzpatrick, D. (2020) Community-led regeneration: A toolkit for residents and planners. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13xpsj7

Sendra, P. (2024) ‘The ethics of co-design’, Journal of Urban Design, 29(1), pp. 4–22. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2023.2171856.

She, S., Chen, X. et al. (2022) ‘Exploring the concept, antecedents, and consequences of environmental psychological ownership’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), p. 12621.

Tritter, J.Q. and McCallum, A. (2006) ‘The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein’, Health Policy, 76(2), pp. 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008

Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). ‘Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor’. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.

UN-Habitat (2015) Global public space toolkit: From global principles to local policies and practice. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). Available at: https://www.local2030.org/library/82/Global-Public-Space-Toolkit--From-Global-Principles-to-Local-Policies-and-Practice.pdf (Accessed: 18 March 2026).

UN-Habitat (2020) City-wide public space assessment toolkit: a guide to community-led digital inventory and assessment of public spaces. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).

Varna, G. and Tiesdell, S. (2010) ‘Assessing the publicness of public space: The Star Model of Publicness’, Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), pp. 575–598.

Village Well (2025) ‘An overview of Village Well’s Regenerative Placemaking Model’, Village Well, 21 July. Available at: [website URL] (Accessed: [insert access date]).

Whyte, W.H. (1980) The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.