Visions of a City for All Resources, Choices and Factors Supporting and Impeding Universal Design in the Urban Development Process
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Despite laws, policies, and visions to create cities and societies for all, barriers still exclude persons with disabilities from using buildings and public places. Our study aimed to identify choices made during the urban development process, which include or exclude users in the built environment; how and when these arise during the process; and what is needed to implement Universal Design (UD) as a strategy and tool to secure all users equal opportunities in the built environment.
The study involved employees and private actors in city development processes. The participants were asked to identify impediments and support of UD in completed building projects to shed light on choices made during the process and on conditions needed to implement UD along the process. Four workshops were followed by qualitative interviews with key players. The analysis was based on qualitative data from workshops and interviews.
Aspects impeding and supporting UD and conflicting visions and goals were identified in all phases, and the need for tools to implement UD. Findings show that accessibility for all users is dealt with (too) late in the process, often causing special solutions. Urban trends like densification and high exploitation can cause exclusion of some users, and an unbalanced view on sustainable development prioritising ecological aspects put high demands on users’ abilities. Findings also show how UD appeared more clearly in remodelling projects than in the new constructions. A strong vision from the start to build for all users clearly supported UD throughout the process. Other factors such as pre-studies which include human diversity, allocation of resources and experts’ early opinions also showed to be clear drivers for UD.
Overall, the findings show a demand for solutions to maintain early visions and goals throughout the processes. We conclude by providing seven recommendations for addressing these challenges.
Read the full article in accessible html-format here.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Bryman, A. (2018) Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder [“Social Research Methods”]. 3rd edition. Liber, Lund.
Carvalho de Souza, S. and de Oliveira Post, A.P.D. (2016) “Universal Design: an urgent need,” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 216, pp. 338-344.
Cars, G. and Hedström, R.T. (2006) Nya villkor för den kommunala planeringen,
p. 157-176, in Blücher, G. and Graninger, G. (eds) Planering med nya förutsättningar. Ny lagstiftning, nya värderingar [“Planning with New Conditions. New Legislation, New Values”]. Linköping University.
Creswell, J. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Egard, H. (2022) “Accessible enough? Legitimising half-measures of accessibility in Swedish Urban Environments,’ in Egard, H., Hansson, K., Wästerfors, D. (eds.) Accessibility Denied: Understanding Inaccessibility and Everyday Resistance to Inclusion for Persons with Disabilities, pp. 1-10. Routledge, Oxon and New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120452-1
Erdtman, E., Rassmus-Gröhn, K. and Hedvall, P-O. (2021) “Universal Design as Guiding, Striving and Unifying: A Qualitative Study about how Universal Design is Understood, Practised and Realised in Contemporary Sweden,” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 23(1), pp. 158-168
Frandsen, A-K., Kirkeby, I.M., Ryhl, C. and Pedersen, L.S. (2012) “Bygningsreglementets Tillgaengelighedsbestemmelser Set i Forhold til Byggeprocessen” [“Provisions on Accessibility in Relation to the Building Process, Danish Building Regulations”]. Danish Building Research Institute report, Copenhagen.
Granbom, M., Iwarsson, S., Kylberg M., Pettersson, C. and Slaug, B. (2016) “A public health perspective to environmental barriers and accessibility problems for senior citizens living in ordinary housing,” BMC Public Health, 16:772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3369-2
Graneheim, U.H. and Lundman, B. (2004) “Qualitative content analysing in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness,” Nurse Education Today, 2004 (24), pp. 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Grangaard, S. (2018) “A Status of Universal Design in Danish Architectural Policies,” in Craddock, G., Doran, C., McNutt, L. and Rice, D. (eds.), Transforming our World Through Design, Diversity and Education: Proceedings of Universal Design and Higher Education in Transformation Congress 2018, pp. 696-705. IOS Press. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 256. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-923-2-696
Hamraie, A. (2012) “Universal Design Research as a New Materialist Practice,” Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 32 (No. 4). http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i4.3246
Harper, D. (2002) “Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation,” Visual Studies, vol. 17:1, pp. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
Hedvall, P-O. (2022) “Framväxten av Universell Utformning – en kulturomdaning,” [“The emergence of Universal Design – a cultural transformation”] in Föreningen UUA (eds) Kunskap för framgångsrik inkludering [“Knowledge for successful inclusion”]. https://www.uua.se/media/s22byhrr/kunskap-fo-r-framga-ngsrik-inkludering-220119-6-sidor.pdf
Heylighen, A., Van der Linden, V. and Van Steenwinkel, I. (2017) “Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment,” Building and Environment, 2017 (114) pp. 507-517. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008
Imrie, R. (2003) “Architects’ conceptions of the human body,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2003, vol. 21, pp. 47-65. DOI:10.1068/d271t
ISO/IEC Guide 71:2014 (2014) “Guide for addressing accessibility in standards.” Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/57385.html
Jones, P. (2014) “Situating universal design architecture - designing with whom?” Disability and Rehabilitation, 2014, (36:16) pp. 1369-1374. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.944274
Kirkeby, I-M. (2015) “Accessible knowledge – Knowledge on Accessibility,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 9, pp. 534-546. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.05.005
Maxwell, J. (2009) “Designing a qualitative study” in Bickman, L. and Rog, D.J. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. 2nd edition, pp. 214-253. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Müller, L., Ericsson, S., Wojahn, D. and Hedvall, P-O. (2021). “Young, Mobile and Highly Educated Cyclists: How Urban Planning and Policy Dis/able Users,” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 23 (1), pp. 124-135. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.731
Plouin, M., Adema, W., Fron, P. and Roth P-M. (2021) “A crisis on the horizon: Ensuring affordable, accessible housing for people with disabilities,” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 261. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/306e6993-en
Ryhl, C. (2014) “The missing link in implementation of universal design: the barrier between legislative framework and architectural practise,” in Caltenco, H.A., Larsson, A. and Hedvall, P-O., Rassmus-Gröhn, K. and Rydeman, B. (eds), Assistive Technology Research Series, vol. 35, IOS Press, pp. 433-434. Universal Design 2014: Three days of Creativity and Diversity. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-403-9-433
Soini, K. and Pirinen, A. (2005) “Workshops – Collaborative Arena for Generative Research,” in the Proceedings of Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Eindhoven, 24-27.10.2005.
Steinfeld, E. and Tauke, B. (2002) “Universal Designing” in Christophersen, J. (ed) Universal Design – 17 ways of thinking and teaching. Husbanken, Oslo. ISBN: 82-90122-05-5.
Swedish Parliament 2010, Plan och Bygglagen, SFS 2010:900 [“Planning and Building Act”]. Retrieved from https://svenskforfattningssamling.se/sites/default/files/sfs/2021-07/SFS2021-788.pdf
United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations, New York.
United Nations (2014) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No. 2, Accessibility. United Nations, New York.
United Nations (2017) New Urban Agenda. United Nations, New York. ISBN: 978-92-1-132731-1
Van der Linden, V., Dong, H. and Heylighen, A. (2016) “From accessibility to experience: Opportunities for inclusive design in architectural practice,” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 2016:2, pp. 33-58.
Yin, R.K. (2011) Kvalitativ forskning från start till mål [“Qualitative Research from Start to Finish”]. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Zallio, M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2021) “Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural practise,” Building and Environment, 2021 (206). https://doi.org/10..1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352