Spatial Orders in Informal Settlements A Study of the Kasokoso Neighbourhood in Kampala, Uganda
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Spontaneous settlements are a feature of urban areas across the world, and the global south in particular. Over the years, studies of these settlements have been framed around upgrading. Premised on the idea that spontaneous settlements were (and are) an undesirable part of the urban fabric. Often described by what they lack (land tenure, space, water, sanitation and adequate shelter), spontaneous settlements appear as a problem to be fixed. Upgrading schemes were thus geared towards ‘regularising’ them, so as to ensure they could fit into the formal desired characteristics of urban spaces. Upgrading largely concentrates on the built fabric, often neglecting the complex social structures that exist and even less about the intricate public/private linkages within these settlements. Interfaces are a physical manifestation of the parochial social order which forms a transitional zone between the public and private territories.
To unpack the spatial negotiations, present in spontaneous settlements, this paper studies the relationship between the built and social environment of the Kasokoso neighbourhood in Uganda. From a study of five dwellings, the study seeks to answer what defines private or parochial (semi-private) spatial orders, and what is deemed as spaces within the public realm? Are these permanent divisions, or are they temporal, varying between day and night? The paper highlights the important aspects of the physical environment including dwelling location, private to public space thresholds, and arrangement of shared open spaces that are interwoven with the social environment of the settlement.
To generate these findings, the study combined observation, interviews, on-site sketching, and field notes to arrive at a comprehensive spatial and social analysis of activities in a spontaneous settlement. Drawing on this data, spatial domains around the five representative dwelling units were mapped and categorised under the social order structure (private, parochial, and public) with supplementary information recorded from narratives by actors within the study area describing their everyday activities.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Banerjee, B., Dietrich, K., French, M. and Reid, J. (eds.) (2014) Streets as tools for urban transformation in slums, pp. 1-86. Available at: https://unhabitat.org/streets-as-tools-for-urban-transformation-in-slums.
Bayat, A. (1997) Un-civil society: The politics of the ‘Informal people’, Third World Quarterly, 18 (1), pp. 53-72. doi:10.1080/01436599715055.
Byerley, A. (2013) Displacements in the Name of (Re)development: the Contested Rise and Contested Demise of Colonial African Housing Estates in Kampala and Jinja. Planning Perspectives, 28(4), pp. 547-570. doi:10.1080/02665433.774537.
Dobson, S., Nyamweru, H. and Dodman, D. (2015) Local and participatory approaches to building resilience in informal settlements in Uganda. Environment and Urbanisation, 27(2), pp. 605-620, doi:10.1177/0956247815598520.
Dörmann, K. and Mkhabela, S. (2019) Urban Compounding in Johannesburg, in: Bénit-Gbaffou, C., Charlton, S., Didier, S. and Dörmann (eds.) Politics and Community-based Research, Perspectives from Yeoville Studio, Johannesburg. Johannesburg, Wits University Press, pp. 161-177.
Dovey, K. and King, R. (2011) Forms of informality: Morphology and visibility of Informal settlements. Built Environment, 37(1), pp. 11-29.
Dovey, K. and Wood, S. (2015) Public/private urban interfaces: type, adaptation, assemblage. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(1), pp.1-16, doi:10.1080/17549175.2014.891151.
Dovey, K., van Oostrum, M., Chatterjee, I. and Shafique, T. (2020) Towards a morphogenesis of informal settlements. Habitat International. 104. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102240
Ernstson, H. and Nilsson, D. 2022. Towards situated histories of heterogeneous infrastructures: Oral history as method and meaning. Geoforum, 134, pp. 48-58.
Gehl, J. (1987) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, Washington.
Gilbert. A. (2000) Housing in Third World Cities: The critical issues. Geography, 85 (2), pp. 145-155.
Govender, V. and Loggia, C. 2022. Adaptive Co-Design for Self-Help Housing in Durban, in: Haput,T.C., Akinlolu, M., Simpeh, F., Amoah, C. and Armoed, Z. (eds.) Construction in 5D: Deconstruction, Digitalization, Disruption, Disaster, Development, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 245, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97748-1_4.
Hackenbroch, K. (2011) Urban informality and negotiated space: negotiations of access to public space in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The Planning Review, 47(187), pp. 59-69. doi:10.1080/02513625.2011.10654019
Hunter, A. (1985) ‘Private, Parochial and Public Social Orders: The Problem of Crime and Incivility in Urban Communities’, in: Suttles and Zald (eds.) The Challenge of Social Control: Citizenship and Institution Building in Modern Society: Essays in Honor of Morris Janowitz. Bloomsbury Academic, London, pp. 230–242.
Jabeen, H. (2019) Gendered space and climate resilience in informal settlements in Khulna City, Bangladesh. Environment and Urbanization, 31, pp. 115–138. doi:10.1177/0956247819828274
Jones, P. (2021) Distance and proximity matters: understanding housing transformation through micro-morphology in informal settlements. International Journal of Housing Policy, 21(2), pp. 169-195. doi:10.1080/19491247.2020.1818052.
Kamalipour, H. (2017) Mapping urban interfaces: A typology of public/private interfaces in informal settlements. Spaces and flows: An International Journal of Urban and Extra Urban Studies. 8(2), pp. 1-12. doi:10.18848/2154-8676/CGP/v08i02/1-12.
Kamalipour, H. (2020) Improvising places: The fluidity of space in informal settlements. Sustainability, 12, doi:10.3390/su12062293.
Kellet, P. and Tipple, G. (2000) The home as workplace: a study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting. Environment & Urbanization, 12(1), pp. 203-214.
Kellet, P. and Napier, M. (1995) Squatter Architecture? A critical examination of vernacular theory and spontaneous settlement with reference to South America and South Africa. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 6, pp. 7-24.
Lirenzsa, F., Ellisa, E. and Paramitha, A. (2019) Spatial negotiations in domestic space of the home-based garment industry in Kampung Tambora, Jakarta. IOP Conference series: Earth and environmental science, 447, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012032
Moreira, P. and Cardoso, R. (2014) Another Day of Life: Spatial Practices and Arbitrary Detentions in Luanda, Angola. Architecture and Culture, 2(1), pp.116-129.
Nkurunziza, E. (2007) Informal mechanisms for accessing and securing urban land rights: the case of Kampala, Uganda. Environment & Urbanization, 19, pp. 509-526. doi:10.1177/0956247807082833.
NHCC (National Housing & Construction Company Limited) (2013) Development Brief for Kireka Slum Redevelopment Project: final report, prepared by National Housing & Construction Company limited, Kampala.
Nguluma, H. (2003) Housing themselves: transformations, modernisation and spatial qualities in informal settlements in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
Rapoport, A. (1990) Systems of activities and systems of settings, in: Kent, S. (Ed.), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space. An Interdisciplinary Cross-Cultural Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 9–20.
Rapoport, A. (2000) Theory, culture and housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 17, pp. 145–165. doi:10.1080/140360900300108573.
Richmond, A., Myers, I. and Namuli, H. (2018) Urban informality and vulnerability: A case study in Kampala, Uganda. Urban Science 2(22), doi:10.3390/urbansci2010022.
Roy, A. (2005) Urban informality: Toward and epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), pp.147-158. doi:10.1080/01944360508976689.
Roy, A. (2011) Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, pp. 223-238. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x.
Southall, A. W. and Gutkind, P. C. W. (1957) Townsmen in the making: Kampala and its Suburbs. East African Institute of Social Research, p. 9.
Tayob, H. (2018) Subaltern Architectures: Can drawing “tell” a different story? Architecture and Culture, 6(1), pp. 203-222. doi:10.1080/20507828.2017.1417071.