Between Perception and Reality Socio-spatial Factors Affecting Youth Wellbeing in Public Space in Cuenca and Ambato
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Youth wellbeing and development are strongly influenced by the physical environment and its conditions; thus, it is essential to examine the relationship between young people and public space. This case study analyses youth wellbeing in Cuenca and Ambato through perception surveys and a comparison with official dashboard data on urban wellbeing. The findings reveal discrepancies between young people's perceptions of public space and official data. These differences weaken their connection to the city and reduce public space usage, ultimately affecting their wellbeing. The study also presents the experience of these cities using placemaking as a tool to bridge this gap and improve youth engagement with urban spaces.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Abramo, H.W. (2005) Juventud y espacio público en América Latina: un ensayo político. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL. [Accedido el 30 de julio de 2025].
Aramburu Otazu, M. (2008) ‘Usos y significados del espacio público’, ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 3(8), p. 143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.v3i8.2461
Bibliorío. (2023) Bibliorío Workshops Report. Bibliorío.
Blum, R. W., Astone, N. M., Decker, M. R., & Shalal, M., 2022. ‘Adolescent connectedness: cornerstone for health and wellbeing.’ BMJ, 379, e069213. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069213.
Broberg, A., Kyttä, M. and Fagerholm, N. (2013) ‘Child-friendly urban structures: Bullerby revisited’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, pp. 110–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.001
Caldeira, T. P. R. (2013) São Paulo: nuevas prácticas urbanas y espacio público. En: V Jornadas Ciudades Creativas, CCK Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2013. Disponible en: https://www.flacsoandes.edu.ec [Accedido el 31 de julio de 2025].
Cardona Rodríguez, J., Osorio Tamayo, L. y Moreno Carmona, N. D., (2014) Construcción del bienestar juvenil en las actuales dinámicas de socialización. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 5(1), pp.77-98.
Chawla, L. and van Vliet—, W. (2020) ‘Welcoming Young People in Urban Placemaking: Learning from Challenges’, in The Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People. 1st Edition. Routledge, pp. 120–134.
Cordero-Vinueza, V.A., Niekerk, F. and van Dijk, T. (2023) ‘Making child-friendly cities: A socio-spatial literature review’, Cities, 137, p. 104248. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104248
Daly, H. S., Coffey, A., & Pettit, K. L. S. (2024) A review of the domains of wellbeing for young people. Urban Institute, January 2024 (corrected January 10, 2024). Available at: https://www.urban.org/research/publication/review-domains-wellbeing-young-people
FGE (2025) Estadísticas de criminalidad en Ecuador 2022. Attorney General's Office.Forero Ospina, P. A., Arcos Guzmán, M. J., y Pérez Amezcua, B., (2022). ‘Representaciones sociales y apropiación del espacio público con jóvenes de la ciudad de Montería, Colombia.’ Análisis Político, (104), pp.139-154.
Gal, T. (2017) ‘An ecological model of child and youth participation’, Children and Youth Services Review, 79, pp. 57–64.
Gillespie, J. (2013) ‘Being and becoming: Writing children into planning theory’, Planning Theory, 12, pp. 64–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212441696
INEC (2025a) National Population and Housing Census 2022. National Institute of Statistics and Census.
INEC (2025b) General deaths 2023. National Institute of Statistics and Census.
Jansson, M., Sundevall, E., & Wales, M. (2016). The role of green spaces and their management in a child-friendly urban village. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 18, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.014
Kyttä, M., Kuoppa, J., Hirvonen, J., Ahmadi, E. and Tzoulas, T. (2014) ‘Perceived safety of the retrofit neighborhood: A location-based approach’, Urban Design International, 19, pp. 311–328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.31
Low, S.M. (2023) ‘Why Public Space Matters’. New York: Oxford University Press.
McEvoy-Levy, S. (2012) ‘Youth spaces in haunted places: Placemaking for peacebuilding in theory and practice’, International Journal of Peace Studies, 17, pp. 1–32.
Owens, P.E. (2002) ‘No Teens Allowed: The Exclusion of Adolescents from Public Spaces’, Landscape Journal, 21, pp. 156–163. doi.org/10.3368/lj.21.1.15
Owens, P.E. (2020) ‘A Fundamental Need: Linking Youth Development to the Public Realm’, In Freeman, C. and Tranter, P. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People. London: Routledge, pp. 7–22.
Ploner, J. and Jones, L. (2019) ‘Learning to belong? Culture and placemaking among children and young people in Hull’.
Safe & Sound Cities (S2Cities) (2023a) Youth safety and wellbeing perception survey, Ambato 2023.
Safe & Sound Cities (S2Cities) (2023b) Youth safety and wellbeing perception survey, Cuenca 2023.
Safe & Sound Cities (S2Cities) (2024a) S2C-AMBATO 2024 - Impact Grant Report: Initiatives’ Use & Safety Perception. Ambato: Safe & Sound Cities Ambato Local Implementation Team.
Safe & Sound Cities (S2Cities) (2024b) S2C- Ambato Implementations. ESS and Renovarte Indicators Report.
Safe & Sound Cities (2024c) Report on placemaking initiatives of Safe & Sound cities Cuenca 2024.
Skelton, T. and Gough, K.V. (2013) ‘Introduction: Young People’s Im/Mobile Urban Geographies’, Urban Studies, 50(3), pp. 455–466. doi:10.1177/0042098012468900
White, S.C. (2017) Relational wellbeing: Re-centring the politics of happiness, policy and the self. Policy & Politics, 45(2): 121–36.
White, S.C. and Jha, S. (2023) ‘Exploring the relational in relational wellbeing’, Social Sciences, 12(11), Article 600. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110600
WHO (2023) World report on mental health. World Health Organization.
Woolcock, G. and Steele, W. (2008) Child-friendly community indicators – A literature review. Urban Research Program, Griffith University and NSW Commission for Children and Young People.
