Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Envisioning Atmospheres of Spectacle and Activism

Utopia and critical urbanism instruments for the reclamation of the fragmented territories of the WALL and the MALL


Woundedlands are places of crisis of the civic sphere, where architecture contributes to escalate the agency of forces that annihilate associative, differential and commoning processes. They are spaces of exemplary expression of the destructive capacity of contemporary technology to increase control, abstraction and exclusion. The Wall and the Mall are two salient Woundedland types addressed in this research. The Wall—a harsh boundary displacing and negating access to the stranger—epitomizes the increasing instances of unmovable and unforgiving socio-spatial divides. The heavily armed Demilitarized Zone created by the stalled Korean conflict is chosen as an egregious walling example. The Mall—a supreme urban embodiment of digitally enhanced urban de-commoning and homogenizing forces—typifies the post-consumerist spectacular production of implanted and exogenous pseudo-civic centralities. The heterotopic integrated shopping centre Sylvia Park—the main centre of this kind in New Zealand—is selected as a key representative instance of the dissociative enclaves of spectacle. Two major phenomena characterize the spatial production of these two Woundedlands: pervasive translocalization—the diffusing mobilization of territorialization patterns—and multiassociative transduction—the iterative production of combinant and immersive metastable spatialities.
Through an articulated design proposition set, these Woundedlands are reimagined as productive utopias of reappropriated and (re)creational Wonderlands. These Wonderlands are a cultural response to the contemporary mode of production, challenging and transmuting its alienating apparatus. The symbols of geopolitical and mercantile warfare are recast into possible analogue worlds where a rich mix of instrumentalities is designed to empower latent and marginalised counterforces. These Wonderlands have mobilised metastable spatialities that give consistency and affirm the commoning of the digitally augmented social networks, boosting socio-spatial relationality and maximal differentiation.
The proposition set shows how by producing alternative discursive frameworks of coordinated narratives with scenario-based and context-specific sign-value articulations, tightly crafted chains of recoded elements propose a novel cultural understanding of the current spatial paradigm. Leveraging on the productive agency of desire, their allegorical fabulatory proses of (extra)ordinary commoning machines for pluralism, justice and jouissance affirm the value and necessity of utopia.

Pages:83 to 108
Section: Systems
How to Cite
Manfredini, M. (2019) “Envisioning Atmospheres of Spectacle and Activism”, The Journal of Public Space, 4(4), pp. 83-108. doi:

Author Biography

Dr Manfredo Manfredini is Associate Professor at the University of Auckland and since 2016 he is Honorary Professor at the Hunan University, Changsha, China.
He studied architecture and urban design in Milan, Rome and Berlin and he has consistently been involved in fundamental and applied research projects, both locally and internationally research over a wide range of topics in architectural theory and criticism, as well as in design at architectural and urban scales. After teaching architecture and urban design in Italy, Germany and China, since 2010 he has been teaching architecture and urban design at the University of Auckland. His current research interests address post-urban spatialisation forms and correlated design aspects, particularly focusing on valorisation, re-qualification and redevelopment of architectural and urban heritage; affordable and special housing; and education in architecture. Each of these areas has been successfully developed in collaboration with international and multi-disciplinary teams, as proven by the track record of consistent publications, successful grants (national and international) and awards (e.g. first price Biennale di Venezia, Sironi Group), and invited participation in major global events (e.g. United Nation Habitat III).


Brickell, Katherine and Datta, Ayona (Eds.) (2011). Translocal geographies: Spaces, places, connections. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Calhoun, Craig (1992). Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere, in Craig Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Studies in contemporary German social thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.1–50.

Castells, Manuel (2000). The rise of the network society. 2nd Edition. London: Edward Elgar.

Connolly, William E. (2005). The evangelical-capitalist resonance machine. Political Theory, 33, pp.869–886.

Dehaene Michiel and De Cauter, Lieven (2008). Heterotopia: A postcivil society, in Michiel Dehaene and Lieven De Cauter (Eds.), Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp.3–9.

Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Foth, Marcus, Brynskov, Martin and Ojala, Timo (Eds.) (2015). Citizen’s right to the digital city: Urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking. Singapore: Springer.

Fuchs, Christian (2014). Social media and the public sphere. TripleC, 12, pp.57–101.

Gelézeau, Valérie (2011). The inter-Korean border region – ‘meta-border’ of the Cold War and metamorphic frontier of the peninsula, in Doris Wastl-Walter (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Oxon: Ashgate, pp.325–348.

Greiner, Clemens and Sakdapolrak, Patrick (2013). Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass, 7, 5, pp.373–384.

Harvey, David (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, pp.23–40.

Harvey, David (2011). The future of the commons. Radical History Review, 109, pp.101–107.

Horvath, Agnes, Benţa, Marius Ion and Davison, Joan (Eds.) (2019). Walling, boundaries and liminality: A political anthropology of transformations. Oxon: Routledge.

Jameson, Fredric and Speaks, Michael (1992). Envelopes and enclaves: The space of post-civil society (an architectural conversation). Assemblage, 17, pp.30–37.

Kazig, Rainer, Masson, Damien and Thomas, Rachel (2017). Atmospheres and mobility. An introduction. Mobile Culture Studies, 3, pp.7–20.

Kim, Nan (2015). Memory, reconciliation, and reunions in South Korea: Crossing the divide. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Koolhaas, Rem (2002). Junkspace. Obsolescence, 100, pp.175–190.

Lefebvre, Henri (1991 [1974]). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lefebvre, Henri (2003 [1970]). The urban revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Linebaugh, Peter (2007). Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley: University of California Press.

MacKenzie, Adrian (2006). Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed, London: Continuum.

Manfredini, Manfredo (2017). The augmented meta-public space. Interpreting emerging transductive territories in enhanced centres of consumption. The Journal of Public Space 2(3), pp.111–128.

Manfredini, Manfredo (2019a). Emerging spatialisations of resilient urban commons: Re-thinking associative networks in the age of advanced translocalism, transduction and meta-publicness. In Beyond Resilience: Towards a More Integrated and Inclusive Urban Design. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism, Jakarta, 24–26 June 2019.

Manfredini, Manfredo (2019b). Give us space, research synthesis report. Retrieved from

Manfredini, Manfredo (2019c). Simulation, control and desire: Urban commons and semi-public space resilience in the age of augmented transductive territorial production. The Journal of Public Space, 4(2), pp. 179-198.

Manfredini, Manfredo (2019d). Travels in Woundedland: Manfredo Manfredini for the Shenzhen Biennale (UABB) 2019, Archdaily. Retrieved from

Manfredini, Manfredo, Zamani Gharaghooshi, Farzad and Leardini, Paola (2017). Instances of emerging agonistic spatialities in the contemporary city: The production of differential geographies in the public space of Istanbul. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 5, 5, pp.281–291.

Merrifield, Andy (2000). Henri Lefebvre: A socialist in space, in Mike Crang and Nigel Thrift (Eds.), Thinking Space. London: Routledge, p.76.

Mouffe, Chantal (2008). Public spaces and democratic politics, in Jeroen Boomgaard (Ed.), Highrise–Common ground. Art and the Amsterdam Zuidas area. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp.135–156.

Purcell, Marc (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, p.578.

Purcell, Marc (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city, Journal of Urban Affairs, 36, 1, pp.141–154.

Ritzer, George (2005). Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption. London: Pine Forge Press.

Sennett, Richard (2018). Building and dwelling: Ethics for the city. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Seo, Alex Young-Il (2018). From disorderly dispersion to orderly concentration: Frontier villages at the Korean border 1951–1973. Scroope: The Cambridge Architecture Journal, 27, pp.43–58.

Simondon, Gilbert (2013 [1964-89]). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de formes et d'information. Paris: Edition Jérôme Millon.
Open Access Journal
ISSN 2206-9658