The aim of this article is to reflect on and share the findings of the Networking Event ‘Give us Space: Augmented public space geographies in the changing public/private relationships.’ The Event addressed emerging spatial issues in the production of the public realm of contemporary cities. This topic has been at the centre of the discourse on urbanism in both humanities and social sciences for decades, reflecting the increasing interest in spatial problems that have contributed to the crisis of public life in the socioeconomic, cultural and political spheres. The recent pervasion of spatial privatisation and public sphere mediatisation processes require a refoundation of this discourse.
The discussions addressed some of the key areas of concern raised by the New Urban Agenda (NUA) related to open space, focusing on socio-spatial problems in the pervading production of semi-public spaces in contexts of rapid urbanization. Using a comparative urbanism perspective that highlighted the expanding role of digital geography, it elaborated upon specific Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. These are the goals concerned with good health and well-being (3), reduced inequalities (10), sustainable cities and communities (11), and partnerships for the goals (17).
The event created a platform for knowledge exchange and networking amongst stakeholders. This aimed to 1) build capacity in both research and practice; 2) identify problems, limitations, and opportunities with respect to the various actors and stakeholders of urban public space; 3) highlight issues concerning less advantaged groups in society: children, youth and elderly, ‘differently-able,’ indigenous people, marginalized genders, migrants and socioeconomically deprived people.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
Beebeejaun, Y. (2017). Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life, Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 323-334.
Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations, Cities, 55, 94-100.
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities, Critical Social Policy, 32 (4), 597-617.
Fuchs, C. (2015). Social media and the public sphere, TripleC: Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12 (1), 57-101.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution, Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
Kitchin, R. (1998). 'Out of place,' 'Knowing one's place': Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people, Disability and Society, 13 (3), 343-356.
Law, L. (2002). Defying disappearance: cosmopolitan public spaces in Hong Kong, Urban Studies, 39(9), 1626-1643.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith, Oxford: Blackwell.
Malone, K. (1999). Growing up in cities' as a model of participatory planning and 'place making' with young people, Youth Studies Australia, 18 (2), 17-23.
Malone, K. (2001). Children, youth and sustainable cities, Local Environment, 6(1), 5-12.
Manfredini, M. (2017). The augmented meta-public space: Interpreting emerging transductive territories in enhanced centres of consumption,” The Journal of Public Space, 2 (3), 111-128.
Manfredini, M., & Jenner, R. (2015). The virtual public thing: De-re-territorialisations of public space through shopping in Auckland’s urban space, Interstices: Journal of Architecture and Related Arts, 16, 70-81.
Manfredini, M., & Ta, A.-D. (2016). Co-Creative urbanism: The production of plural evolutionary spatialities through conflicts and complicities between public and private in the streets of Hanoi, Vietnam, Joelho, Journal of Architectural Culture, 7, 132-155.
Manfredini, M., & Ta, A.D. (2017). The production of pluralistic spatialities: The persistence of counter-space territories in the streets of Hanoi, Vietnam, in R. Galdini, A. Marata & M. Spada (Eds.), Creative cities: Public space and everyday places (pp. 373-381), Rome: CNAPPC.
Manfredini, M., Xin, T., & Jenner, R. (2017). Transductive urbanism: A method for the analysis of the relational infrastructure of malled metropolitan centres in Auckland, New Zealand, Athens Journal of Architecture, 3 (4), 411-440.
Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Morimoto, I. (2015). Tourism, consumption and the transformation of Thamel, Kathmandu, in C. Bates & M. Mio (Eds.), Cities in South Asia (pp. 309-325), New York, NY: Routledge.
Sennett, Richard (2018). “The open City,” in UN-Habitat, R. Sennett, R. Burdett & S. Sassen (Eds.), The Quito Papers and the New Urban Agenda (90-95), Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis.
UN-Habitat (2016). The New Urban Agenda, http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf.
Reeves, D. E., Parfitt, B., & Archer, C. (2012). Gender and urban planning: Issues and trends: Gender and Urban Planning (HS/050/12E), Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Reeves, D. E. and Zombori, E. (2016). Engendering cities: International perspectives from Aotearoa New Zealand, Town Planning Review, 87 (5), 568-587.
Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J., & Levine, D. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments, London: Wiley.