Futurible Heterotopias of Phygital Spectacle Understanding How Digital Technologies Intensify Spatial Segregation in Quasi-Public Commercial Centres
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
In contemporary cities, the disruption caused by new consumption practices, most notably e-commerce, has intensified the creative destruction of shopping environments. A prominent reinvention of the extra-ordinary experience offered by hyper-consumption centres involves the phygital (physical + digital) augmentation of spectacle leveraging multireality and interaction technologies. This reinvention catalyses translocal, multilevel and asynchronous sociospatial interactions, challenging the inherent city-antagonist logic of these centres by seemingly removing their enclavic character. By transcending the quartering barriers of complicit self-segregation that characterise their function as Foucauldian heterotopia of compensation and illusion, they reassociate the highly fragmented space, culture and society of our cities. This article analyses the effectiveness of the city-antagonism reversal by reintegrating and repoliticising quasi-public space or, as suggested by Foucault’s genealogy theory, cunningly remodulating its insular functions. Through an empirical investigation of a prominent shopping centre - Beijing’s SKP-S - featured with advanced phygital spectacles, this study analyses both people-to-people and people-to-space interactions. The methodology combines behavioural observation with a multidimensional social media analysis of 8,827 Weibo posts from 5,392 users spanning 2019-2024, including an expedited computer vision classification of visitor-generated images. It examines posting patterns, engagement metrics, and content characteristics. Findings indicate that the subversion of the city-antagonist heterotopian character is only apparent: while digital technologies introduce new compensatory functions that promote digital social engagement, and new illusory functions that enhance the spectacular potential to foster the collective imagination of positive possible futures, these innovations deploy new mechanisms of socio-spatial control that intensify, rather than diminish their segregative capacity. Instead of de-privatising urban experiences, advanced phygitalisation enables commercial spaces to further colonise private social relationships through social media sharing practices; it exacerbates the contradictions intrinsic to these compensatory spaces, which - as per Foucault - are “as perfect, as meticulous, as well arranged as ours is disorderly, ill construed and sketchy.”
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Benjamin, W. (1999 [1982]) The Arcades Project. Translated by H. Eiland and K. McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Boy, J.D. and Uitermark, J. (2023) On Display: Instagram, the Self, and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boyd, D. and Crawford, K. (2012) ‘Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon’, Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), pp. 662–679.
Brusseau, J. (2020) ‘Deleuze’s Postscript on the Societies of Control: Updated for Big Data and Predictive Analytics’, Theoria, 67(164), pp. 1–25.
China Internet Network Information Centre (CNNIC) (2025) The 55th Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development [Online]. Available at: www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202505/P020250514564119130448.pdf (Accessed: 14 March 2026).
Churchill, E. (2022) ‘Platform Urbanism, Urban HCI, and Digital Civics’, Interactions, 29(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3530683
Coyne, R. (2010) The Tuning of Place: Sociable Spaces and Pervasive Digital Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Crawford, M. (1992) ‘The World in a Shopping Mall’, in Sorkin, M. (ed.) Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 3–30.
Degen, M. and Rose, G. (2012) ‘The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory’, Urban Studies, 49(15), pp. 3271–3287.
Degen, M. and Rose, G. (2024) ‘Conceptualising aesthetic power in the digitally-mediated city’, Urban Studies, 61(11), pp. 2176–2192.
Dehaene, M. and De Cauter, L. (2008) ‘Heterotopia in a postcivil society’, in Dehaene, M. and De Cauter, L. (eds.) Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 15–22.
Deleuze, G. (1992) ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, 59, pp. 3–7.
Ding, W. and Guo, T. (2023) ‘Research on the application of interactive installation art in modern commercial space under the background of experience economy’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII 2023). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 111–119.
Foucault, M. (1977) ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, in Bouchard, D.F. (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 139–164.
Foucault, M. (2008 [1967]) ‘Of other spaces’, in Dehaene, M. and De Cauter, L. (eds.) Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 13–29.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012) Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.
Healey, P. (2020) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Johnson, P. (2013) ‘The geographies of heterotopia’, Geography Compass, 7(11), pp. 790–803.
Kitchin, R. and Dodge, M. (2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Manfredini, M. and Jenner, R. (2015) ‘The Virtual Public Thing: De-re-territorialisations of public space through shopping in Auckland’s urban space’, Interstices: Journal of Architecture and Related Arts, 16, pp. 70–82.
Manfredini, M. (2017) ‘The Augmented Meta-Public Space: Interpreting emerging transductive territories in enhanced centres of consumption’, The Journal of Public Space, 2(3), pp. 118–128.
Manfredini, M. (2019a) ‘Mobility, translocalisation and transduction: The resilience of new urban commons in the era of advanced technospheres’, in Marata, A. (ed.) Diverse City. Rome: CNAPPC – Consiglio Nazionale Architetti Paesaggisti Pianificatori e Conservatori, pp. 1–10.
Manfredini, M. (2019b) ‘Simulation, Control and Desire: Urban Commons and Semi-Public Space Resilience in the Age of Augmented Transductive Territorial Production’, The Journal of Public Space, 4(2), pp. 179–198.
Manfredini, M. (2020) ‘Affirmatively Reading Post-consumerism: Distributed Participatory Creativity and Creative Destruction of the Malled Metropolitan Centres of Auckland, New Zealand, during COVID-19 Lockdown’, The Journal of Public Space, 5(3), pp. 207–226.
Manfredini, M. (2022) ‘The Mediatized City: The Structural Transformation of Emplaced Relationality and the Resilience of Depoliticized Urban Commons’, in Brears, R.C. (ed.) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_321-1
Marcuse, P. (2005) ‘Enclaves yes, ghettos no: Segregation and state’, in Varady, D.P. (ed.) Desegregating the City: Ghettos, Enclaves, and Inequality. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 15–30.
Muzzio, D. and Muzzio-Rentas, J. (2008) ‘“A kind of instinct”: The cinematic mall as heterotopia’, in Dehaene, M. and De Cauter, L. (eds.) Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 149–162.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2026) Wang Pingping: China’s Total Population Reached 1,404.89 Million in 2025, with Continued Progress in High-Quality Population Development [Online]. Available at: www.stats.gov.cn/sj/sjjd/202601/t20260119_1962338.html (Accessed: 14 March 2026).
Ou, Y. (2021) Public Space and Consumption in the Mobile Internet Era: The Heterotopic Inversions of Ultra-modern Financialised Urban Centres. Master’s dissertation. University of Auckland.
Ou, Y. and Manfredini, M. (2020) ‘Public Space and Consumption in the Mobile Internet Era: A Study on the Heterotopic Inversion of Ultra-Modern Shopping Malls’, in Proceedings of the 13th International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU). October 2020, pp. 390–409.
Ou, Y. and Manfredini, M. (2022) ‘The Configurational Analysis of the Ultra-Modern Shopping Centre in the Urban Restructuring of the Mediatized Era: A Study of Ultra-Modern Centre Based on the Method of Space Syntax’, in Proceedings of the 13th International Space Syntax Symposium (SSS13).
Ou, Y., Manfredini, M., Gao, G., Sun, R. and Su, Q. (2022) ‘Sociospatial Wellbeing in Urban Commercial Centres: An Analysis of Abstraction and Relationality of Novel Mall Spatialities in the Mobile Internet Era’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Indonesian Architecture and Planning. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 557–578.
Pine, B.J. and Gilmore, J.H. (1998) ‘Welcome to the Experience Economy’, Harvard Business Review, 76(4), pp. 97–105.
Real Estate and Business (2022) 2021 National Shopping Mall Sales Ranking TOP50 [Online]. WeChat Official Account. Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/cknbX3u16zZ3huMAxdUDyA (Accessed: 30 August 2025).
Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N. and Imschloss, M. (2019) ‘The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), pp. 350–366.
Rigby, D. (2011) ‘The future of shopping’, Harvard Business Review, 89(12), pp. 65–76.
Roux, D., Guillard, V. and Blanchet, V. (2018) ‘Of counter spaces of provisioning: reframing the sidewalk as a parasite heterotopia’, Marketing Theory, 18(2), pp. 218–233.
Schumpeter, J.A. (2003 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Shane, D.G. (2008) ‘Heterotopias of illusion: from Beaubourg to Bilbao and beyond’, in Dehaene, M. and De Cauter, L. (eds.) Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 271–284.
Sina Weibo Data Centre (2024) 2024 Weibo User Consumption Trend Report [Online]. Available at: https://data.weibo.com/report/reportDetail?id=473 (Accessed: 10 March 2026).
Voyce, M. (2006) ‘Shopping malls in Australia: The end of public space and the rise of “consumerist citizenship”?’, Journal of Sociology, 42(3), pp. 269–286.
Yunus, F. and Akhtar, A. (2025) ‘Impact of Social Media on Consumer Buying Behavior in the Offline Mode’, Management and Economics Research Journal, 11(2), pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18639/MERJ.2025.9900110
Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
